Risk factors for hospitalization, disease severity and mortality in children and adolescents with COVID-19: Results from a nationwide German registry (preprint)

Objective To characterize the clinical features of children and adolescents hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infections and to explore predictors for disease severity. Design Nationwide prospective observational cohort study. Setting Data collected from 169 out of 351 childrens hospitals in Germany between March 18, 2020 and April 30, 2021 and comparison with the Statutory Notification System. Participants 1,501 children and adolescents up to 19 years of age with laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections who were admitted to childrens hospitals and subsequently reported to the COVID-19 registry of the German Pediatric Infectious Disease Society (DGPI). Main outcome measures Admission to intensive care, in-hospital. Results As compared to the information in the statutory notification system, up to 30% of all children and adolescents hospitalized in Germany during the study period were reported to the DGPI registry. Median age was three years (IQR, 0-12), with 36% of reported cases being infants. Although roughly half of patients in the registry were not admitted to the hospital due to their SARS-CoV-2 infection, 72% showed infection-related symptoms during hospitalization. Preexisting comorbidities were present in 28%, most commonly respiratory disorders, followed by neurological, neuromuscular, and cardiovascular diseases. Median length of hospitalization was five days (IQR 3-10). Only 20% of patients received a SARS-CoV-2-related therapy. Infants were less likely to require therapy as compared to older children. Overall, 111 children and adolescents were admitted to intensive care units (ICU). In a fully adjusted model, patient age, trisomy 21, coinfections and primary immunodeficiencies (PID) were significantly associated with intensive care treatment. In a bivariate analysis, pulmonary hypertension, cyanotic heart disease, status post (s/p) cardiac surgery, fatty liver disease, epilepsy and neuromuscular impairment were statistically significant risk factors for ICU admission. Conclusion Overall, a small proportion of children and adolescents was hospitalized in Germany during the first year of the pandemic. The majority of patients within our registry was not admitted due to COVID-19 suggesting an overestimation of the disease burden even in hospitalized children. Nevertheless, a large proportion of children and adolescents with confirmed COVID-19 reported in Germany could be captured. This allowed for detailed assessment of overall disease severity and underlying risk factors in our cohort. The main risk factors for COVID-19 disease associated intensive care treatment were older patient age, trisomy 21, PIDs and coinfection at the time of hospitalization. Trial registration Registry of hospitalized pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19), DRKS00021506

Feasibility and diagnostic accuracy of saliva-based SARS-CoV-2 screening in educational settings and children aged < 12 years (preprint)

Children have been disproportionately affected during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to assess a saliva-based algorithm for SARS-CoV-2 testing to be used in schools and childcare institutions under pandemic conditions. A weekly SARS-CoV-2 sentinel study in primary schools, kindergartens and childcare facilities was conducted over a 12-week-period. In a sub-study covering 7 weeks, 1895 paired oropharyngeal and saliva samples were processed for SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR testing in both asymptomatic children (n=1243) and staff (n=652). Forty-nine additional concurrent swab and saliva samples were collected from SARS-CoV-2 infected patients (patient cohort). The Salivette® system was used for saliva collection and assessed for feasibility and diagnostic performance. For children a mean of 1.18 ml saliva could be obtained. Based on results from both cohorts, the Salivette® testing algorithm demonstrated specificity of 100% (95% CI 99.7 - 100) and sensitivity of 94.9% (95% CI 81.4 - 99.1) with oropharyngeal swabs as reference. Agreement between sampling systems was 100% for moderate to high viral load situations (defined as Ct-values < 33 from oropharyngeal swabs). Comparative analysis of Ct-values derived from saliva vs. oropharyngeal swabs demonstrated a significant difference (mean 4.23; 95% CI 2.48–6.00). In conclusion, the Salivette® system proved to be an easy-to-use, safe and feasible saliva collection method and a more pleasant alternative to oropharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2 testing in children aged 3 years and above.

Weekly SARS-CoV-2 sentinel in primary schools, kindergartens and nurseries, June to November 2020, Germany (preprint)

A 12-week sentinel programme monitored SARS-CoV-2 in primary schools, kindergartens and nurseries. Out of 3169 oropharyngeal swabs, only two tested positive on rRT-PCR while general incidence rates were surging. Thus, children attending respective institutions are not significantly contributing to the pandemic spread when appropriate infection control measures are in place.